Marxismo e Estudos Subalternos: A controvérsia sobre a fracassada universalização do capital
Marx, los marxismos y la cuestión colonial
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Palavras-chave

Teoría Pos-colonial; Estudios Subalternos; marxismo; capitalismo; universalización. Post-colonial Theory; Subaltern Studies; Marxism; capitalism; universalization. Teoria pós-colonial; Estudos Subalternos; Marxismo; capitalismo; universalização.

Como Citar

Castaño García, C. C. (2022). Marxismo e Estudos Subalternos: A controvérsia sobre a fracassada universalização do capital. Pacha. Revista De Estudios Contemporáneos Del Sur Global, 3(7), e21084. https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v3i7.84

Resumo

Este artigo analisa a controvérsia iniciada com a publicação do livro do sociólogo americano Vivek Chibber, Teoria Pós-colonial e o Espectrador do Capitalismo (PTSC), que trata das limitações analíticas e políticas da Teoria Pós-colonial (PT), especificamente os Estudos Subalternos (SS). Será dada uma breve visão geral do argumento de Chibber e serão apresentadas respostas à sua análise, com ênfase especial na discussão da relevância do marxismo e do conceito de "universalização do capital" proposto por Marx na Grundrisse. Conclui-se que a tese marxista da universalização do capital deve ser entendida como a globalização do modo de produção capitalista e que a historiografia do capitalismo deve incluir o papel do sul global na formação do capitalismo, a fim de se afastar do eurocentrismo.

https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v3i7.84
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Referências

Ahmad, A. (1992). In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. Verso.

Anievas, A., y Nisancioglu, K. (2017). Limits of the Universal: The Promises and Pitfalls of Postcolonial Theory and Its Critique. Brill. Historical Materialism, 25(3), 36-75. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341539

Chakrabarty, D. (2005). A small history of Subaltern Studies. En H. Schwarz, & S. Ray (Eds.). A Companion to Postcolonial Studies (pp. 467-485). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997024.ch25

Chakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

Chatterjee, P. (2013). Subaltern studies and capital. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(37), 69-75.

Chattopadhyaya, U. (26 de junio de 2014). Author’s Roundtable: Vivek Chibber, "Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital" Response by Utathya Chattopadhyaya. Union for criticism. https://cutt.ly/fFggilk

Chibber, V. (2013). Postcolonial theory and the Specter of Capitalism. Verso.

Chibber, V. (25 de Febrero de 2014a). Subaltern Studies Revisited: Vivek Chibber's Response to Partha Chatterjee. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1529-subaltern-studies-revisited-vivek-chibber-s-response-to-partha-chatterjee

Chibber, V. (2014b). Confronting Postcolonial Theory. A response to critics. Journal of World-Systems Research, 20(2), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2014.561

Chibber, V. (2014c). Making sense of postcolonial theory: a response to Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(3), 617-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.943593

Guha, R. (1997). Dominance Without Hegemony. Harvard University Press.

Heideman, P. (2 de mayo de 2013). Not Even Marxist? Paul M. Heideman examines Chris Taylor's critique of Vivek Chibber. Verso Books. https://cutt.ly/VFggqad

Kaiwar, V. (2004). Towards Orientalism and Nativism: The Impasse of Subaltern Studies. Review of Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference by Dipesh Chakrabarty and Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India by Ranajit Guha. Brill. Historical Materialism, 12(2), 189-247.

Kaiwar, V. (2014). The Postcolonial Orient: The Politics of Difference and the Project of Provincialising Europe. Brill.

Larsen, N. (2001). Determinations: Essays on Theory, Narrative and Nation in the Americas.Verso.

Lazarus, N., y Rashmi, V. (2008). Marxism and Postcolonial Studies. En J. Bidet y S. Kouvelakis (Eds). Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism (pp. 309-332). Brill.

Marx, K. (2007). Grundrisse: Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de la economía política. Borrador 1857-1858. Siglo XXI.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Acerca del colonialismo. Júcar.

Nilsen, A. (2017). Passages from Marxism to Postcolonialism: A Comment on Vivek Chibber’s Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. Critical Sociology 43(4–5), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0896920515614982

Parry, B. (2004). Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique. Routledge.

Seth, S. (2014). Review of Postcolonial Theory and the Spectre of Capital by Vivek Chibber. American Historical Review, 119(4), 1218–1220.

Sewell, W. H. (2014). On Vivek Chibber's Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. Journal of World-Systems Research, 22(1), 300-303.

Spivak, G. (2014). Postcolonial theory and the Specter of Capitalism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(1), 184-198.

Taylor, C. (29 de abril de 2013). Not even Marxist. C.L.R James. http://clrjames.blogspot.no/2013/04/not-even-marxist-on-vivek-chibbers.html

Zapata, C. (2018). El giro decolonial. Consideraciones criticas desde América Latina. Pléyade, 21, 49-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-36962018000100049

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licensiado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Christian Camilo Castaño García

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...